“The lack of consensus reflects differences in theoretical positions” “Community members first aspire to unanimity. However, when one or more people block the proposal, the blockers hold a series of solution-oriented meetings, with one or two proposals, to develop a new proposal that will address the same problems as the original proposal. The new proposal will be presented at the next meeting, where it will likely occur. If no new proposal is developed, the original proposal will be presented at the next meeting for a super majority of 75%, and it will likely be adopted. In 25 years at N Street Cohousing, this process has only taken place twice, with two solution-oriented meetings. Excerpt from Busting the Myth that consensus with unanimity is good for municipalities, 2012 The group first chooses, say, three arbitrators or consensuals. The debate on the chosen problem is initiated by the moderator who launches proposals. Any proposed option is accepted when arbitrators decide that it is relevant and in accordance with the UN Charter of Human Rights. Referees establish and display a list of these options. The debate continues, with questions, comments, criticism and/or even new options. If the debate fails to reach a verbal consensus, the arbitrators draw up a definitive list of options – usually between 4 and 6 – to represent the debate.
If everyone agrees, the president asks for a preferential vote, in accordance with the rules of a modified Count of Borda, MBC. Referees will decide on the option or combination of the two main options. If support exceeds a minimum consensus coefficient, it can be accepted.   The Quaker model has been adapted by Earlham College for application to secular attitudes and can be applied effectively in any consensual decision-making process. The confusion between unanimity and consensus therefore usually leads to the failure of consensus decisions, and the group then returns either to the majority rule, or by super majority, or by dissolving. Proposals for members` assemblies are usually drawn up by teams and then brought to a meeting of members. There are a number of preliminary steps to ensure that proposals take into account a wide range of views before being adopted to become full members. These include themes that circulate for pre-meeting reactions and discussions, where people can ask questions and bring additional concerns and ideas. If a proposal fails to reach consensus in the members` assembly, it can be withdrawn or a workshop is set up for those who have the most opinion to resolve disputes and propose an amended proposal. At the time of writing (spring 2017), Unicorn has a rapidly growing membership and is exploring new ways to maintain a high level of engagement.
Business meetings of the Religious Society of Friends (Quaker) use a process close to consensus to integrate each other`s ideas and achieve a better approach to truth. The basic model for reaching consensus, as defined in any decision-making rule, includes: Unicorn Grocery is a workers` cooperative that operates a full-time shop in Manchester, UK. You are a very successful ethical activity and you now have more than 70 employees. Unicorn engages in the collective management of flat management and makes consensual decisions and works in teams where most operational decisions are made on a day-to-day basis. Elected team representatives meet annually in 14-day meetings to support and monitor subgroup tasks and decision implementation.